Friday, February 1, 2008

Steve Wilkos is a Fake

When I first heard about the Steve Wilkos show, I thought it would be like Jerry Springer. Then I watched and thought "Hey this guy really wants to help." Well, I was very wrong. Caught the show one day and he was all over some guy about not seeing his child. The guy kept trying to tell him that the mother wouldn't let him see the child and Steve pretty much told him that he was full of it.
I emailed the show and told them about how hard, if not impossible it is to get to see a child if the custodial parent didn't want you too. Have lived through it with my husband, thousands spent on attorneys and counselers and whenever he'd show up to get her, it just wasn't "convenient". This is not a small child, she's a teenager. He has called the police and was told that it wasn't a police matter.
Needless to say, the show contacted me and as soon as I told them we weren't interested in being on the show, the producer "Elizabeth" didn't care anymore. I told her I thought Steve needed to be informed that there are thousands of parents out there going through this and she told me "I'm not going to tell my boss how to do his job". So I guess Steve doesn't care what the facts are, it's just a glorified Jerry Springer show. He couldn't care less about how things really are, just how he wants to present the.
Big disappointment to me, I'll never watch again.

49 comments:

GREG said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
One Ordinary Woman said...

I agree. This guy is ridiculous. WHAT A FAKE. If he really wants to help, he needs to do this show so completely differently... but then he'd get no ratings... and no money... I guess everyone's got their priorities (no matter how screwed up they are).

Scotty Boy said...

I am so glad that the world is exposing this douche bag for what he is. a douchebag. i think he should do the world a favor and go back to walking the beat. oh yeah and i heard he retired from law because the gang bangers used to send him home crying everyday.

GLASS HALF EMPTY said...

Steve Wilkos likes to cause friction. I have noticed that in almost every show (if not all) that no matter what a guest says Steve will have turn it around to look bad on the guest. If a guest says something like "They wouldn't let me see my child" Steve will say "What do you mean...If that was me I would walk over broken glass and fire to see my kids" If the guest says the opposite like "I always see my children and pay for their care" Steve will say something like "Pay for their care? They don't even want you around!" You just can't win with Steve. Also the lie detector test has been proven to be inaccurate, but to Steve the tests are infallible.

Loki said...

You might want to change the head line on your page from, "steve wilkos is a FACE" to "steve wilkos is a FAKE" lol :)

Kyle said...

Steve isn't perfect and I am not a die-hard Steve fan. However, he does have good intentions, he is a great judge of character, and he has a police instinct for picking out the bad guy. I watch his show and I see a lot of troubled, but decent people getting the help they need.

earl said...

Don't agree with u guys at all, I'm guessing y'all are all just fuck ups that hate on him because you can see yourself being one of those loser he chews out for being deadbeats on his show.

ThreeDimensions said...

Sad how the only fuck-up here seems to be Earl; one of those turnabout fucks who think just because "you don't like Steve, you must be Satan's bastard child."

You--and everyone like you--have fundamentally flawed reasoning. I hate Steve Wilkos like the plague; he's abrasive, inhospitable, and totally fake. But oh, wait...that makes me a loser, doesn't it?

Too bad I don't lie, cheat and steal to further my own means, huh? Too bad I don't lift my hands to strike a woman or molest children. Subjects Steve Wilkos is perfectly apt to--and perfectly fine with--faking for monetary gain.

michael said...

I just have trouble with the lie detecter. Steve acts like it is the absolute truth. Just not so.

NolanK said...

I like Steve wilkos. I think its a great show. He makes the dirtbags get wat they deserve. Every show has people who think its fake or it sucks or Watever. But to go make a page on the internet about it...you obviously have no life. I hate jersey shore but I'm not guna go waste my time making a page about it. I hope the person who made this page gets a swift kick in the crotch and a punch in the forehead.

Gregory Keplar said...

Ok I see how the owner of this Blog is now. You removed my comment back in 2008 just because I said I like The Steve Wilkos Show. And Now that this new Guy Just Posted A comment As Well Talking About How He Loves the SHOW TO. You will Probably Removed His Post As Well. Because He is Right. You Do Deserve A swift Kick In The Ass, And A Punch In the Forehead. So Just remember that before you delete these two posts. ps. Learn How to Spell. Its F A K E

NolanK said...

Haha people are just being babies. There's always someone crying about something. The person who made this page probly deleted your comment because they know we are both right. I bet they wouldn't have the grapes to say their accusations to Steve's face

kayla said...

The Steve show is so fake I was on there and they paid me and told me to elaborate my story good money tho

wingo said...

Want to complain some more? He can't fix everyone's problems! Grow up and get over yourself. Selfish people.

Deception said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deception said...

Just watch the show! You can tell it's all fake. No one in their right mind would willingly go on that show after watching it. Why the fuck would these people submit to a polygraph if they were guilty? For one, I don't trust a polygraph as far as I could throw one. It's all about the integrity of the show. It serves exactly one purpose. Drama! It exists solely for the purpose of allowing people to judge others and put them on display so they can forget for an hour how fucked up they themselves are. I am not perfect by any means. I will even go as far as to say I should be sitting in jail for some of the shit I have done in the past. I know scum when I see it, because I am scum. Steve Wilkos is one and the same as myself. He thinks the louder he screams and threatens others, the more invisible his own indiscretions will become. I see you, Steve!

TheREALIST said...

STEVE WILKOS IS DEFINITLY A FAKE & HERE IS THE REAL PROOF:

ACCORDING TO HIS LIFE STORY - HE GREW UP IN THE STREETS OF CHICAGO, HUNG AROUND WITH A BAD CROWD, DONE DRUGS AND EVENTUALLY GOT HELP THROUGH A DRUG REHAB CENTER.

HE FINISHED SCHOOL, WENT ON TO COLLEGE, JOINED THE MARINES, AND BECAME A COP.

"BULL CRAP"

STRIKE 1 - NO COLLEGE WOULD EXCEPT SOMEBODY WITH A DRUG RELATED BACKGROUND.

STRIKE 2 - THE MARINES WOULD NOT TAKE A FORMER DRUG USER EITHER.

STRIKE 3 - AS A FORMER DRUG USER - HE COULD NOT PASS THE PHYSICAL TRAINING TO MAKE IT IN THE MARINES OR THE POLICE ACADEMY.

THEN THERE'S THE LIE DETECTOR TEST.

STEVE WILKOS DOESN'T BELIEVE IN ANYTHING PAST THE RESULT OF A LIE DETECTOR TEST DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT FOOL PROOF. A REAL COLLEGE EDUCATED EX-COP WOULD KNOW BETTER THAN THAT. STEVE WILKOS DOES NOT.

THOSE TEST RESULTS COULD SHOW PEOPLE LYING DESPITE THE FACT THAT SOME OF THEM COULD BE TELLING THE TRUTH, AND THAT JUST GOES TO SHOW THAT THESE LIE DETECTERS ARE HIGHLY OVERRATED ON THESE TALK SHOWS.

WHO KNOWS HOW MANY LIVES AND MARRIAGES HAVE BEEN RUINED AS A RESULT OF THESE STUPID POLYGRAPH TESTS ?

I EVEN SAW ONE SHOW WHERE STEVE WILKOS ACTUALLY DEFENDED A MAN ACCUSED OF RAPE ONLY BECAUSE HE PAST THE LIE DETECTOR TEST.

DOESN'T STEVE WILKOS KNOW THAT MEN WHO RAPE WOMEN ARE KNOWN TO BE PHSYCOTIC MINDED ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ?

DOES STEVE WILKOS HAVE A CLUE ON HOW EASILY A PHSYCOTIC MINDED RAPIST CAN LIE THEIR WAY THROUGH A LIE DETECTOR TEST ?

WHO KNOWS HOW MANY PHSYCOTIC MINDED PEOPLE HAVE LIED THEIR WAY THROUGH A LIE DETECTOR TEST AND MADE STEVE WILKOS LOOK LIKE A BUFFOON ?

HOW RIDICULOUS IS IT TO THINK THAT A GUY WHO CLAIMS TO BE A FORMER MARINE AND AN EX-COP ENDS UP HOSTING A TALK SHOW WHERE HE USES A POLYGRAPH TEST TO DETERMINE THE FUTURE OF PEOPLE'S LIVES.

I HOPE YOU'RE READING THIS STEVE WILKOS BECAUSE I HAVE A MESSAGE FOR YOU:

QUIT USING A LIE DETECTOR TO PLAY GOD OVER PEOPLE'S LIVES.

FORGET THIS LIE DETECTOR TEST GARBAGE AND START PRODUCING SOME "REAL" EVIDENCE FOR FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE.

Reginald Figgs said...

You said the lady wasn't gonna tell him?so how does that reflect on him if he never even got the info from the lady?

Madison Grandone said...

if he was a drug user he could be accepted into the marines if he was never arrested and if he didnt pop on the drug test at meps. how else would they find out? and just because you are on drugs doesnt mean you cant pass the requirements in basic training. so that proves nothing of him being fake what so ever.
also if its so damn fake he obviously isnt ruining anyones life since they arent real in the first place.
its tv, obviously things are going to be more over dramatic than what they should be for the sake of television.

HELP THE CLUELESS said...

TO THE DELUSIONAL REALIST... UMM I WENT TO COLLEGE. A VERY ASTUTE COLLEGE AT THAT. THEY DO NOT DRUG TEST YOU, YOU BLUBBERING IDIOT. THEY CARE ABOUT TRANSCRIPTS, EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES, CLUBS IN HIGH SCHOOL AND LET US NOT FORGET, MOST IMPORTANTLY, YOUR ABILITY TO PAY YOUR TUITION.
SECONDLY, THE UNITED STATES MILITARY DOES NOT DENY PAST DRUG USERS. YOU YOURSELF CLAIMED THAT STEVE CLEANED UP HIS ACT, THEN JOINED THE MARINES. CRACKHEADS PROBABLY COULDN'T SURVIVE A SINGLE HOUR OF BOOTCAMP, HOWEVER WHAT IF HIS PRIOR DRUG USE WAS POT? EVEN COCAINE. THE MILITARY GIVES YOU DRUG TESTS BEFORE SENDING YOUR ASS TO BOOTCAMP. IF YOU HAVE DIRTY URINE, YOU HAVE SERIOUS REPRECUSSIONS, BUT YOU ARE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO GET YOUR SHIT TOGETHER. I LOVE OUR MILITARY. I AM PATRIOTIC. I AM HUMBLED BY THE FACT THAT MEN AND WOMEN ARE WILLING TO GIVE UP THEIR LIVES SO THAT YOU, ME AND EVEN STEVE WILKOS CAN SAY WHAT WE WOULD LIKE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT IS ALL ABOUT FREEDOM, BUT IF YOU THINK FOR ONE SECOND THAT THERE ARE NOT ACTIVE DRUG USERS CURRENTLY SERVING, YOU ARE AS MISINFORMED AND DELUSIONIONAL AS YOUR POST.

TheREALIST said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TheREALIST said...

If you want the inside track on how retarded guys like Steve Wilkos, Jerry Springer, & Maury really are - Check out how they all deal with the issues of INCEST RELATIONSHIPS. How many times have we seen guests come out on these shows, admit to having sex with relatives and seeing the crowd overreact, getting all worked up & act like these people are the first and only incest couple on the face of this planet ??? Between Wilkos, Springer, & Maury - We've seen all 3 retarded talk show hosts use the same lame arguement "I LOVE MY SISTER BUT I WOULD NEVER SLEEP WITH MY SISTER" From there the crowd blindingly cheers them on. Don't these 3 men realize that what's wrong for them is not guaranteed to be wrong for others ? Do they really believe the whole world revolves around by their standards ? We are living in an age where couples & relationships have been known to work for people in all sorts of various lifestyles wether anybody realizes it or not. Incest is no exeption wether anybody likes it or not. When it comes to regular relationshipes and marriages - The Uniteds States alone leads the world population in divorce rates. How does that gives society the right to pass judgement against other types of relationships that works for some people in life ? Wilkos Springer & Maury never really considered the fact that there are 2 sides to every story. All 3 are all childish. They think they're right about everything, But I'll tell you what the fact is: HISTORY IS FULL OF EXAMPLES THAT PROVES WHEN PEOPLE PASS JUDGEMENT AGAINST CERTAIN TYPES OF RELAIONSHIPS JUST BEACAUSE IT'S DIFFERENT THAN WHAT MOST ARE ACCUSTOM TO, IT ENDS UP PROVING TO BE DESTRUCTIVE & POINTLESS, AND AT THE SAME TIME IT ADDS A CERTAIN FORM OF BIGOTRY IN OUR SOCIETY WE DON'T REALLY WANT. WE'VE SEEN IT HAPPEN TOO MANY TIMES BETWEEN HOMOSEXUALITY AND BLACK & WHITE MIX MARRIAGES. ALL I'M SAYING IS: FOR ONCE - WE SHOULD TAKE THE TIME TO THINK THINGS THROUGH BEFORE WE START ADDING ANOTHER FORM OF BIGOTRY IN OUR SOCIETY WE DON'T REALLY WANT.

They can't even use RELIGION as an excuse because according to the Bible's "Adam & Eve" Adam was born from the grounds of the Earth. Eve was born from Adam's rib. Together they were living under the same flesh and blood. If God felt it was good for 2 people of the same flesh & blood to be fruitful and multiply since the beginning if time, Then it stands to reason the world never had a real arguement against incest relationships to begin with. Most people believe incest is wrong only because they were raised & taught to believe it's a crime against nature, But in reality - It's not even a proven crime to the face of life. As far as their rights to having children are concerned - We are living in an age where even gays/lesbians have had great success in raising children - Who can guarantee that an incest couple can't have that same success without giving them a fair chance ? We don't know what makes a person fall in love with a relative. That's all the more reason why we should not judge something we can't fully understand. If the future proves having feelings for a relative is no more of a choice than homosexuality - Then there's no point in passing judgement against it. Until then the best thing we can do is Live & Let Live.

TheREALIST said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TheREALIST said...

To HELP THE CLUELESS:


Here are 3 strikes to your arguement:

STRIKE 1 - If the U.S. Marines really did allow drug addicts - How can anyone take the Armed Forces and the Troops seriously ?

STRIKE 2 - How many wars would America win if the armed forces were filled with drug addicted soldiers ?

STRIKE 3 - What kind of message would it be sending to the drug addicted teens throughout the country if drug addicts were allowed in ?


I can go on & on & on about this between now until dooms day, But whats the sense in talking to you ?


CMack said...

@TheRealist now either your the most nieve person in the US or the stupidest. The military would not know a persons back round. They only drug test going in. If I smoke crack for 4 years then stop for 1 week and join. Crack wouldn't show up in my urinalysis so the marines would let me in. Not let in a crackhead because they didn't know last week I was doing it. Just an analogy I don't smoke crack.

Sierra Trenholm said...

Absolutely ignorant. If you have a drug issue or a drug CHARGE, you can go to court and get it dropped if you agree to join the army, the navy or the marines. remember, opinions aren't facts. Dumbass.

Sierra Trenholm said...

you're absolutely positively one of the most ignorant people I've come across. research before you claim your OPINION is a fact. 3 of my friends and my husband had a drug charge, when they went to court, the charges were dropped because the chose the army. They give you an option.you can either pay a shit ton of money for lawyers and HOPE your record is cleared, live with it for the rest of your life, or go to thhe army and it all gets dropped and expunged. you have six months after court to enlist in the army or your charges Resurface. stupid fuck.

TheREALIST said...

CMack & Sierra Trenholm - You people don't get it. Have you ever heard of getting a Military Physical Examination ? A Drug Test ? or even taking shots for a Military Blood Test ? These are ways they find out wether drugs are in your system. Unlike Steve Wilkos stupid lie detector tests - Those Test results are "FOOL PROOF" Tell me Now I'm not talking facts based on reality.

Melody Nolan said...

@The Realist Re incest. The problem with incestual relationships is that the part of the brain that deals with judgment is not fully developed until the early 20's. So, there is a lack (of the true ability) to consent. The other problem is that the issue of child molestation goes well beyond the sexual act: it is often accompanied by fear, secrecy, threats...and even lies about what is going on. The relatives involved play a part in it to, because the farther away they are from the "victim" the less of a different type of relationip has developed. So, my main points are the (in)ability to consent, accompanying actions such as threats and violence, and how far apart they are on the family tree (which is not foolproof - sometimes second cousins are close, but you get the general concept.

TheREALIST said...

Melody Nolan - Incest has nothing to do with child molestation. The fact is - No relationship in this world is ever entirely wrong as long as it's based on consenting adults who share the same feelings for each other. It doesn't matter at all where they stand in each others lives. It's how they feel about one other that counts. Incest couples would never molest their children any more than gay/lesbian parents would. There's no evidence to prove otherwise. The only real reason why most incest couples choose to keep their relationship a secret is because society is (more often than not) too quick to judge things in life they don't fully understand.

Regardless - If something works for some people in life, It can't be entirely wrong.

Remember - There are proven cases where regular married couples have been known to molest their children and they are the ones who are currently serving time in prison, Not the homosexuals or incest couples.

If you still doubt that in some cases incest can work in a beautiful way - You might want to check out this true to life movie on YouTube called " I LOVE MY LITTLE SISTER " The remarkable true story about an Asian incest couple that have been in love since they were children.

I have seen the evidence on how incest relationships work for some people in many ways. This true story film is just a small sample. Believe me - It's worth a look.

nobody.cares.but.you.dumbasss said...

u all who r bantering back and forth (cough, cough -the realist) have no outside life other than the internet. good luck with letting ur bitchyness out on the internet where nobody but u cares...

Elizabeth Dong said...

One big reason, I don't agree with incest is that children of incest siblings, genetically, have problems. I mean, in their genes, those children are programmed to die much likely than a non-incest produced child. If you and a sibling were to both inheriet a disease from your parents, then your child will have a much greater chance of having that deformality. Biologically speaking, it would unwise to engage in incest and morally speaking, it would be selfish to have that for their child.

Elizabeth Dong said...

On a moral stance, I disagree with incest because I believe in different bonds of love. I believe there are plenty of bonds that are far more powerful than a romantic and sexual bond. I believe that some bonds can sometimes be wrongfully confused or swapped. I have 3 siblings and I understand that feeling of deepness and closeness, but even I know that feeling of intimacy is far FAR beyond any intimacy I may feel around a romantic partner. I can literally see that difference between those two relationships. I don't see a barrier; I see that those bonds shouldn't even be slightly familiar besides the closeness and compactibility of the two parties.

think.exist. said...

Buddy, the caps key isn't that tough to find. You hurt my brain.

TheREALIST said...

Elizabeth Dong:

Where is it written that an incest couple Can't produce healthy children ??? Don't forget - There used to be a time when people used to think that black and white parents would produce unhealthy children just because of skin color alone. Today we all know what kind of garbage that really is, And in the case of Genders - TIME could easily put incest parents on that same boat someday. All skin colors and genders work exactly the same way no matter where couples stand in each others lives.

marsha arias said...

Very well said, and I don't see how this comment would offend anyone. You seem like a well rounded person, the world Could definently use a lot more people with your kindness, and lovely spirit.

A.Palazzo said...

I LOVE the show!! I LOVE how he stands up to the "bad guys" for the victim! the guy who ddoes the test use to work for the FBI I'm sure they're accurate & they administer the test 3 times.

A.Palazzo said...

incest is morally wrong & produces problems in Hunan molecular structure aka DNA. it may not affect the baby but down the line it can affect that child's children. here's an example. a child is born with bright red hair when the whole family nor the parents have red hair. a distant past relative had red it & it was passed down.

A.Palazzo said...

*human. Also I am a M.A. soon to be certified. ;)

J matt said...

It's all about sensationalism!

Teddy Humphries said...

Are you trying to say you fucked your sister?

Mark Elliott said...

The saddest part of all these comments i find are the ones saying if you were arrested for a drug charge and join the army that the charges will disappear,, what a pathetic country you people live in. Just like Steve Wilkos, the American government prey's on the stupid. And bring no good to the world

d money said...

dont know if the show is real or not but as far the marines thing they are very strict and they army is any joe can join marines have to meet special requirements , and i worked for the airforce before they dont piss only mouthswabs and hair samples so your shit better be clean. to become cop anywhere you have to pass a lie detector test and yes they question if you ever used or abused drugs besides marijuana, so do some research is all i can say, some of the situations are too fucked up to be on tv i wouldnt expose my self on a show where your foced to take a lie detector test if i was some type of molester or sleeping with a family member or something who does that

Brian Pan said...

This is why I believe the show is a fake, or at least a setup. 1) Every single guest that comes out after the character who called the show is interviewed by S.W. comes out charging and screaming. The producers must be telling them to go out as mad as possible to make their case, then 2) I always here the "Steve..Steve..Steve" rant but no one in the audience is moving their mouths. I recorded 2 different ones and they were identical. They are using tapes and presenting it as real audience response.

DaHanci said...

Hopefully this doesn't offend anyone:
"Steve Wilkos is a Fake"

Actually, with these accusations, you mean he's rude, right? Or he doesn't care? I clicked this because I thought it might be somewhat informative on how it's possibly scripted.

"When I first heard about the Steve Wilkos show, I thought it would be like Jerry Springer."

Ha ha... no. I actually prefer Steve to Jerry because Jerry Springer is usually bestiality, lesbians, transvestites, cheating, and prostitutes/strippers. I don't have an issue that that's what's on the show, but Steve has abusers, molesters, pedophiles, robbers, and the like, which I just personally find more intriguing.

"Then I watched and thought 'Hey this guy really wants to help.'"

Depends. It is possible that sometimes he can't help too much, like in the woman who killed her child using drugs. Of course he was mad, and when the husband did nothing, he was obviously upset they only came on for rehab when this woman didn't want it/couldn't take it. However, he did do his best to help the teen addicted to heroin.

"Well, I was very wrong. Caught the show one day and he was all over some guy about not seeing his child. The guy kept trying to tell him that the mother wouldn't let him see the child and Steve pretty much told him that he was full of it."
There are many times when abusers or molesters say "I didn't see my child after the abuse because his mother's family wouldn't let me."
This is just an excuse- usually they didn't care.
"I emailed the show and told them about how hard, if not impossible it is to get to see a child if the custodial parent didn't want you too. Have lived through it with my husband, thousands spent on attorneys and counselers and whenever he'd show up to get her, it just wasn't "convenient"."

...Have never heard of this. "Convenient"? Or a restraining order? This doesn't entirely seem possible, but alright.

"This is not a small child, she's a teenager. He has called the police and was told that it wasn't a police matter."

Maybe he should have gone to Steve Wilkos ;)

"Needless to say, the show contacted me and as soon as I told them we weren't interested in being on the show, the producer "Elizabeth" didn't care anymore."

Well, they need money, and they probably get complaints every day. They can't just take on every person who talks and can't go on the show. But this would prove that the show is not fake and it's real people. So people commenting here saying you agree and think it's 'fake' too and 'people are actors'... She's saying almost the opposite.

"I told her I thought Steve needed to be informed that there are thousands of parents out there going through this and she told me 'I'm not going to tell my boss how to do his job'."

Because she can't... She's the producer. She can't walk up to him and start talking about it.

"So I guess Steve doesn't care what the facts are, it's just a glorified Jerry Springer show. He couldn't care less about how things really are, just how he wants to present the."

And you took this opinion from one show that touched you the wrong way. Obviously it must be correct.

"Big disappointment to me, I'll never watch again."

That's fine. Also, take off the 'disappointed Steve Wilkos fan' description. 'Disappointed fan' would be someone who read a book and found out the author is a child molester. You are not a fan; you probably watched a couple shows. Which is fine, but it's like saying you're a Katy Perry fan because you know about Teenage Dream and Last Friday Night.

Sorry for long post!

~da Hanci

Saint Markus said...

Da Hanci, I think I love you.

:-)

Artsy Cell Cases said...

I do like to watch Steve Wilkos, however, I have found that many of his lie detector results were inaccurate and caused a lot of trouble with the families who were affected.

One Example would be the Christina Whitaker episode.

This woman is still missing today, Steve brought the family and two previous boyfriends of hers onto the stage and had all of them take a lie detector test.

The one who 'failed' as the live-in boyfriend, whom was also living with the parents at the time she went missing. The family had no doubts before the show that he was not involved because they knew he was home the night she disappeared, they believed it was the ex-boyfriend (who passed Steve's test btw). After the results were read the family immediately reacted and lashed out at him. Steve continued to yell at him and play on the man's fears as he was visibly nervous and scared overall.

After the show, he went down to a REAL police station and volunteered to take THEIR lie detector test and he PASSED.

The family then went public, said they were not sorry for going onto the show as they wanted the media attention for their daughter's disappearance, but they were disappointed with the results as they, obviously, were wrong.

You can find more on this here:
http://www.connecttristates.com/news/story.aspx?id=420922#.VCV22hYZ7xQ


So I'm not saying, all his shows are 'fake' but Steve knows how to play on people's fears and pry into their personal lives. He then judges them as he see fits and works to get a reaction out of the 'guilty' party to gain ratings.

He was trained, as an officer, how to get information out of people, what he forgets is people lie or will spout random information when they feel backed into a corner sometimes and the lie detector tests are not always accurate (that's why they're NOT admissible in COURT).

He just needs to take a step back and find a different way to go about his shows to get more accurate information (more research and evidence) like a real lawyer would, but the only thing he's really interested in is if they pass their tests or not and then he reacts based on the results - Not a good set up.

Peter Smythe said...

No earl, if the outcome of his show is more harm than good and does not make anything better, just shames and humiliates (who probably need help rather than abuse) and gets facts wrong. All for the sake of a profitable show, then it is unethical and unacceptable.

Johnny said...

This post is almost 7 years old and people are still commenting on it. Amazing!!!

Steve is what he is, he came from the Springer show for fucks sake. I think Steve is cool but totally full of shit just like his buddy Springer. They've done a good job of getting rich by feeding peoples souls with the most vile rubbish humankind has ever seen. What kind of sick twisted motherfuckers subject themselves to the type of humiliation that Steve and Springer dish on daily basis?
What kind of sadistic society enjoys watching such human misery? The whole country is sick and Wilkos proves it every single day.


Good job on the comments.